HAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
1.1. Background of the Study
English
as an international language has an important role to develop science
and technologies many countries in the world use English as a medium of
communication among people in different countries, and also of writing
many kinds of books in which those are spread in different countries. In
Indonesia there are many kinds of foreign books
written in English, whether they are medical, Economical, Botanical, or
other books, they claim Indonesian students to be able to learn and to
use English in schools or in society in order that the books they read
can be applied in various fields so that the development of science and
technologies in Indonesia can be obtained.
For many years, English
has been the most important foreign language in Indonesia, Which is
taught from elementary school to university. However, in senior high
school, English is taught as main subject in which the government has
changed the curriculum into Curriculum Based on Competence 2004 to be
KTSP in 2008. According to Departemen Pendidikan Nasional (2003: 36).
“The
competence-basing language curriculum is a systematic draft and
strategy which build the communicative competence or the competence of
contextual. It means that it builds all the basis of competences
themselves. They are like linguistics competences, social culture and
strategies to make the benefit context.”
From the statement
above, it is clear that Curriculum Based on competence 2004-2009 tries
to develop and achieve the communicative competence or discourse
competence and has perspective that is comprehensive to the discourse.
The learners must be able to master the four skills, they are:
listening, speaking, reading, and writing, also English components such
as: grammar, vocabulary, pronunciation, etc.
Among the four skills
above, writing is the most difficult one. Because it requires
demonstrating the control of a number of variables simultaneously; they
are control of content, format, sentence structure, vocabulary,
punctuation spelling, etc. Nunan (1989: 35) points out, “It has been
argued that that learning to write fluently and expressively is the most
difficult of the macro skills for all language users regardless of
whether the language in question is first, second, or foreign language.”
Another opinion comes from Heaton (1989: 138). He explain that the
writing skills are complex and sometimes difficult to teach, requiring
mastery not only of grammatical and rhetorical devices but also of
conceptual and judgment elements. It means that ability to write needs a
special skill and process in organizing language material by using
learners’ own words and ideas and to be a good composition.
According
to the results of the research done by the students of IKIP Budi Utomo
Malang show that in learning English, most of the students find
difficulties, especially in applying grammar in their speaking and
writing. So, they will make mistakes and errors. It describes that
learners’ ability in English is still poor and they need to be taught
more effectively.
The learners often make mistakes and even errors in
learning English, especially when they try to arrange sentences or use
tenses in their writing. As a result, they will write sentences
ungrammatically. Actually, ungrammatical sentences have great influence
when the learners are writing sentences. That can be influenced by the
first language which is different from the second language in written
form. Therefore, the first language can interfere learners in the
process of the second language. Abbort (1981: 216) wrote,
“For
pedagogic purposes, teachers and others more likely to be concerned with
the performances of whole groups and especially with the problems they
have in commons. For these purposes, we need to ensure that the data
comes from fairly homogeneous groups as regards mother tongue, age,
previous teaching, and if possible, intelligence. Perhaps the most
important of these factors is the mother tongue, particularly if
phonological errors arte being studied
From the statement above,
it can be seen that errors in learning a second language are caused by
the interference of the learners’ mother tongue. In other words, errors
made by the learners sometimes are caused by use of the first language.
Making
Errors are a natural and unavoidable part of the process of learning
English. Many kinds of errors arise when the learners write because they
do not master the English structure well. Also, errors are the
inability of the students in using rules of the components and elements
of the second language. Brown (1987: 170) Said that ”second language
learning is a process that is clearly not unlike first language learning
in its trial and errors nature”. It means that the learners cannot
avoid errors in learning second language. That statement is supported by
Wiganti (2000: 11)
“Many linguist and researcher have found out that
learners’ errors may account the process of learning a target language,
in other words, making errors is considered to be natural to the
learners. More extremely, they hypothesize that errors should not be
viewed as problems to be overcome, but rather as normal and inevitable
features indicating the strategies that learners use.”
So almost
all learners must make errors when they are learning English because it
is difficult to separate error in the process of learning English.
Students’
errors are very useful ways of showing what they have and have not
learnt. Dubin F. and Olshtain E. (1986: 74) reported,: … , today
errors are viewed as an integral part of the language-learning process
from which we can gain very significant insight.” It tells that errors
are important to study in order to understand the process of learning. A
study of learners’ errors describes what problems the learners are
having now and help the teacher to plan remedial work. In addition, the
teacher should not see negatively as a sign of failure but see them
positively as an indication of what the teacher still needs to teach.
So, if the teacher tries to prevent students; errors, he/she never finds
out what they do not know.
There are four standard competences in
curriculum based on competences in Curriculum Based on Competence
2004-2009. One of them is writing. In writing students are hoped to be
able to express many written meanings that have purposes in
communicative, text structure etc. They can develop their writing in the
forms of genre (kinds of text) such as: narrative, descriptive,
recount, news items, etc as a means of communications.
One of genres
is recount. Non-continuous tells something happening in the present
time, like: brochure, label, biography, diary, report, personal letter,
etc. As it tells some events, it usually uses sequence words such as:
If, while, after, before, until, etc. Then, tense used in recount text
is simple present tense, because it tells present events.
To make a
good composition, the students must be able to master and apply the
structure correctly, especially about tense used. In this case, the
tense used is simple present tense. If they cannot do that, of course,
errors will arise. Automatically their writing will cause
misunderstanding for the readers, because the readers cannot receive the
massage or expression of their idea well. Most of the students still
find problems in using it, because of their limited mastery, especially
the differences between regular and irregular verb. Therefore the writer
wants to analyze the errors made by the students and tries to give
solutions to overcome their problems. He chooses the title “An Error
Analysis on the Use of Simple present Tense among the Ninth Year
Students of SMPN 3 Pare.”
1.2. Statement of the problems
Based
on the background of the study there are problems, which can be
formulated after identifying the type errors, omitted among the ninth
year students of SMPN 3 Pare
The problem can be stated as follows:
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar